<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remember the Primaries? Good times, good times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pumapac.org/2008/10/23/remember-the-primaries-good-times-good-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pumapac.org/2008/10/23/remember-the-primaries-good-times-good-times/</link>
	<description>People United Means Action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 03:24:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: moniquemonicat</title>
		<link>http://blog.pumapac.org/2008/10/23/remember-the-primaries-good-times-good-times/comment-page-7/#comment-208575</link>
		<dc:creator>moniquemonicat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pumapac.org/?p=2082#comment-208575</guid>
		<description>URGENT!  Proof Obama BORN IN KENYA – HEAR THE INTERVIEW HERE:

Former Democrat DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA HAS A RECORDING OF OBAMA&#039;S GRANDMOTHER IN KENYA STATING OBAMA WAS IN FACT BORN IN KENYA and is NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.  And one of the reasons Obama will not release his college transcripts.
One of the 3 REQUIREMENTS for becoming a US President IS you must be a natural born citizen and Obama is in FACT NOT.
 
This DISQUALIFIES OBAMA AS PRESIDENT.

Obama’s scamming the entire country!

LISTEN TO INTERVIEW HERE: COPY AND PASTE THIS LINK IN YOUR BROWSER:

http://michaelsavage.wnd.com/?pageId=2256 

URGENT: PASS THIS ALONG TO A FRIEND</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>URGENT!  Proof Obama BORN IN KENYA – HEAR THE INTERVIEW HERE:</p>
<p>Former Democrat DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA HAS A RECORDING OF OBAMA&#8217;S GRANDMOTHER IN KENYA STATING OBAMA WAS IN FACT BORN IN KENYA and is NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.  And one of the reasons Obama will not release his college transcripts.<br />
One of the 3 REQUIREMENTS for becoming a US President IS you must be a natural born citizen and Obama is in FACT NOT.</p>
<p>This DISQUALIFIES OBAMA AS PRESIDENT.</p>
<p>Obama’s scamming the entire country!</p>
<p>LISTEN TO INTERVIEW HERE: COPY AND PASTE THIS LINK IN YOUR BROWSER:</p>
<p><a href="http://michaelsavage.wnd.com/?pageId=2256" rel="nofollow">http://michaelsavage.wnd.com/?pageId=2256</a> </p>
<p>URGENT: PASS THIS ALONG TO A FRIEND</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SergeiRostov</title>
		<link>http://blog.pumapac.org/2008/10/23/remember-the-primaries-good-times-good-times/comment-page-7/#comment-207979</link>
		<dc:creator>SergeiRostov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pumapac.org/?p=2082#comment-207979</guid>
		<description>i&gt;#132 indy on 10.23.08 at 2:14 pm Aaron Goldstein writes:

So here are five things you can say to an Obama supporter if he or she sees fit to call you racist because you don’t see fit to put your faith in The Anointed One at the ballot box: 

               I pointed this out on Puma United Radio yesterday:

  [Note: argument expanded from what I said on PUR due to lesser time constraints- SAR]

        (If the person is old enough)

        Ask them if they voted for Al Sharpton in 2004.

        If they didn&#039;t (which is pretty likely), then call THEM a racist, and see what they say. 

       If they respond that he didn&#039;t make it through to the general election, then point that out as further evidence of THEIR racism (i.e. they didn&#039;t work hard enough for him because they were racist).
      If they say he wasn&#039;t &quot;articulate&quot; enough, or that he was &quot;nutty&quot; or &quot;unelectable&quot; (or what have you), say that they are just saying that because they are racist (you can even throw in the term &#039;code words&#039; here if you like).

        Oh, and if they weren&#039;t old enough in 2004, tell them they didn&#039;t work hard enough to get voting-age people to vote for him because they are racist.

         At this point, you can follow up with asking them if they&#039;re voting for McCain, and when they say no, ask them why they hate senior citizens. If they give a reasons why they&#039;re not voting for McCain, tell them they are just saying those things because they hate senior citizens (and/or are sexist, optionally). Keep pressing until they say they it&#039;s not that they hate senior citizens, but that they have good reasons for supporting Obama. Then say, &quot;Well, I have good reasons for supporting McCain. Don&#039;t say I hate blacks and I won&#039;t say you hate senior citizens.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&gt;#132 indy on 10.23.08 at 2:14 pm Aaron Goldstein writes:</p>
<p>So here are five things you can say to an Obama supporter if he or she sees fit to call you racist because you don’t see fit to put your faith in The Anointed One at the ballot box: </p>
<p>               I pointed this out on Puma United Radio yesterday:</p>
<p>  [Note: argument expanded from what I said on PUR due to lesser time constraints- SAR]</p>
<p>        (If the person is old enough)</p>
<p>        Ask them if they voted for Al Sharpton in 2004.</p>
<p>        If they didn&#8217;t (which is pretty likely), then call THEM a racist, and see what they say. </p>
<p>       If they respond that he didn&#8217;t make it through to the general election, then point that out as further evidence of THEIR racism (i.e. they didn&#8217;t work hard enough for him because they were racist).<br />
      If they say he wasn&#8217;t &#8220;articulate&#8221; enough, or that he was &#8220;nutty&#8221; or &#8220;unelectable&#8221; (or what have you), say that they are just saying that because they are racist (you can even throw in the term &#8216;code words&#8217; here if you like).</p>
<p>        Oh, and if they weren&#8217;t old enough in 2004, tell them they didn&#8217;t work hard enough to get voting-age people to vote for him because they are racist.</p>
<p>         At this point, you can follow up with asking them if they&#8217;re voting for McCain, and when they say no, ask them why they hate senior citizens. If they give a reasons why they&#8217;re not voting for McCain, tell them they are just saying those things because they hate senior citizens (and/or are sexist, optionally). Keep pressing until they say they it&#8217;s not that they hate senior citizens, but that they have good reasons for supporting Obama. Then say, &#8220;Well, I have good reasons for supporting McCain. Don&#8217;t say I hate blacks and I won&#8217;t say you hate senior citizens.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SergeiRostov</title>
		<link>http://blog.pumapac.org/2008/10/23/remember-the-primaries-good-times-good-times/comment-page-7/#comment-207926</link>
		<dc:creator>SergeiRostov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pumapac.org/?p=2082#comment-207926</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;290 Pookie on 10.23.08 at 5:13 pm Nobama was in our capital today Indianapolis I watched him for about 5 minutes he had the meanest look on his face, I was thinking how could people vote for this person there was not a kind look on his face. &lt;/i&gt;

             When he actually smiles I admit to being startled,  he so rarely does it.

             Bill Clinton, on the other hand, always seems to genuinely enjoy campaigning.

             Of course, we know that that&#039;s because Bill enjoys debating and convincing people, but Obama expects people will just agree with them, and gets angry when they don&#039;t.





&lt;i&gt;Then the station reported that 57% of people polled think that McCain has run a negative campaign and only 29% thought Bo had. wonder who they polled?&lt;/i&gt;


I would still like to see the state-by-state Electoral College breakdown with polls adjusted for what even Obamabots say is the proper sampling (+6 Dem) Instead of this 50-33-17 or even 50-20-30 stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>290 Pookie on 10.23.08 at 5:13 pm Nobama was in our capital today Indianapolis I watched him for about 5 minutes he had the meanest look on his face, I was thinking how could people vote for this person there was not a kind look on his face. </i></p>
<p>             When he actually smiles I admit to being startled,  he so rarely does it.</p>
<p>             Bill Clinton, on the other hand, always seems to genuinely enjoy campaigning.</p>
<p>             Of course, we know that that&#8217;s because Bill enjoys debating and convincing people, but Obama expects people will just agree with them, and gets angry when they don&#8217;t.</p>
<p><i>Then the station reported that 57% of people polled think that McCain has run a negative campaign and only 29% thought Bo had. wonder who they polled?</i></p>
<p>I would still like to see the state-by-state Electoral College breakdown with polls adjusted for what even Obamabots say is the proper sampling (+6 Dem) Instead of this 50-33-17 or even 50-20-30 stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SergeiRostov</title>
		<link>http://blog.pumapac.org/2008/10/23/remember-the-primaries-good-times-good-times/comment-page-7/#comment-207912</link>
		<dc:creator>SergeiRostov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pumapac.org/?p=2082#comment-207912</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;181 BillieJo on 10.23.08 at 3:30 pm I asked Murphy but no responce….does anyone have the link (if there is one) of how the Clinton delegates voted in the Denver convention. We were waiting and that is another issue that seems to have been forgotten on this blog. I would still like to know before I vote.&lt;/i&gt;

        
       I imagine, though, that you&#039;re looking so you can decide whether or not to vote for your state&#039;s Dems?

 I don&#039;t have a link to that, but as I recall, the voting was suspended - and Obama nominated by acclimation - before all the delegates voted (about 20% never got to vote)...but perhaps I am mistaken here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>181 BillieJo on 10.23.08 at 3:30 pm I asked Murphy but no responce….does anyone have the link (if there is one) of how the Clinton delegates voted in the Denver convention. We were waiting and that is another issue that seems to have been forgotten on this blog. I would still like to know before I vote.</i></p>
<p>       I imagine, though, that you&#8217;re looking so you can decide whether or not to vote for your state&#8217;s Dems?</p>
<p> I don&#8217;t have a link to that, but as I recall, the voting was suspended &#8211; and Obama nominated by acclimation &#8211; before all the delegates voted (about 20% never got to vote)&#8230;but perhaps I am mistaken here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SergeiRostov</title>
		<link>http://blog.pumapac.org/2008/10/23/remember-the-primaries-good-times-good-times/comment-page-7/#comment-207903</link>
		<dc:creator>SergeiRostov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pumapac.org/?p=2082#comment-207903</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;65 KYkitten on 10.23.08 at 12:53 pm I was watching Obama speak today ( not making eye contact don’t worry lol)- j/k– anyway as far as those attacks that mccain is calling obama a terrorist. To be honest I find obama’s message to insenuate that in some way the GOP is a cult- that it is going to try to “stop something” and stop at nothing &lt;/i&gt;

               RFK Jr and Greg Palast already have an article up at Rolling Stone
 http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/23638322/block_the_vote

 claiming the GOP is out to steal the election. While I respect their work, there is one question which Palast and Kennedy can&#039;t answer, because to do so would destroy their entire argument: if the GOP can still use all those techniques to steal  elections like they did in 2000 and 2004, why didn&#039;t they do it in 2006? 

Answer: because they don&#039;t work anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>65 KYkitten on 10.23.08 at 12:53 pm I was watching Obama speak today ( not making eye contact don’t worry lol)- j/k– anyway as far as those attacks that mccain is calling obama a terrorist. To be honest I find obama’s message to insenuate that in some way the GOP is a cult- that it is going to try to “stop something” and stop at nothing </i></p>
<p>               RFK Jr and Greg Palast already have an article up at Rolling Stone<br />
 <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/23638322/block_the_vote" rel="nofollow">http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/23638322/block_the_vote</a></p>
<p> claiming the GOP is out to steal the election. While I respect their work, there is one question which Palast and Kennedy can&#8217;t answer, because to do so would destroy their entire argument: if the GOP can still use all those techniques to steal  elections like they did in 2000 and 2004, why didn&#8217;t they do it in 2006? </p>
<p>Answer: because they don&#8217;t work anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SergeiRostov</title>
		<link>http://blog.pumapac.org/2008/10/23/remember-the-primaries-good-times-good-times/comment-page-7/#comment-207885</link>
		<dc:creator>SergeiRostov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pumapac.org/?p=2082#comment-207885</guid>
		<description>#301 clintondemocrat on 10.23.08 at 6:26 pm 

      In my opinion, 87% is the high end. It could be as low as  78%.
      In a neighborhood sign canvass I performed (relative&#039;s neighborhood in WI), 7% of the McCain signs were &lt;i&gt;specifically&lt;/i&gt; &quot;Another Democrat for McCain&quot; ones....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#301 clintondemocrat on 10.23.08 at 6:26 pm </p>
<p>      In my opinion, 87% is the high end. It could be as low as  78%.<br />
      In a neighborhood sign canvass I performed (relative&#8217;s neighborhood in WI), 7% of the McCain signs were <i>specifically</i> &#8220;Another Democrat for McCain&#8221; ones&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: storytellers</title>
		<link>http://blog.pumapac.org/2008/10/23/remember-the-primaries-good-times-good-times/comment-page-7/#comment-207861</link>
		<dc:creator>storytellers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pumapac.org/?p=2082#comment-207861</guid>
		<description>i am listing to savage</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am listing to savage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SergeiRostov</title>
		<link>http://blog.pumapac.org/2008/10/23/remember-the-primaries-good-times-good-times/comment-page-7/#comment-207852</link>
		<dc:creator>SergeiRostov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pumapac.org/?p=2082#comment-207852</guid>
		<description>#280 zephyr
       
       I also have experienced that politics can be spiritually damaging. I&#039;m hope that injecting enough humor into it - in the form of parodies, satire, etc. - will help. :)

      (And of course lots more meditation :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#280 zephyr</p>
<p>       I also have experienced that politics can be spiritually damaging. I&#8217;m hope that injecting enough humor into it &#8211; in the form of parodies, satire, etc. &#8211; will help. <img src='http://blog.pumapac.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>      (And of course lots more meditation <img src='http://blog.pumapac.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clintondemocrat</title>
		<link>http://blog.pumapac.org/2008/10/23/remember-the-primaries-good-times-good-times/comment-page-7/#comment-207840</link>
		<dc:creator>clintondemocrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pumapac.org/?p=2082#comment-207840</guid>
		<description>&quot;I read over at No Quarter that Battleground is claiming the PUMA movement is dead based of the claim that Obama has now garnered the support of 87% of Democrats…right, and I’ll be busy all this weekend shooting down the monkeys that flew out of my butt….&quot;

87% is not good.  You should always ALWAYS have somewhere above 90% of your base and Democrats should be his base.  That means that at least 13% of Democrats are NOT voting for the chosen one.  We estimated in a previous race in my state that a senatorial candidate would have won if we had gotten one more vote in every precinct throughout the state out to vote for our candidate.  That seems like very little but let&#039;s say there are just enough people at the right places who are PUMAs who are not voting Obama, then it doesn&#039;t matter how much of the DEMOCRATS he has shored up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I read over at No Quarter that Battleground is claiming the PUMA movement is dead based of the claim that Obama has now garnered the support of 87% of Democrats…right, and I’ll be busy all this weekend shooting down the monkeys that flew out of my butt….&#8221;</p>
<p>87% is not good.  You should always ALWAYS have somewhere above 90% of your base and Democrats should be his base.  That means that at least 13% of Democrats are NOT voting for the chosen one.  We estimated in a previous race in my state that a senatorial candidate would have won if we had gotten one more vote in every precinct throughout the state out to vote for our candidate.  That seems like very little but let&#8217;s say there are just enough people at the right places who are PUMAs who are not voting Obama, then it doesn&#8217;t matter how much of the DEMOCRATS he has shored up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clintondemocrat</title>
		<link>http://blog.pumapac.org/2008/10/23/remember-the-primaries-good-times-good-times/comment-page-6/#comment-207829</link>
		<dc:creator>clintondemocrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pumapac.org/?p=2082#comment-207829</guid>
		<description>i just saw the information on unoffical results being posted from early voting.

All this LEGALLY can tell you is how many people voted at each location in early voting.  We also had the possibility in 2004 to get access to who had voted in 2004 and drop them out of the caling lists.  

states that have party registration with voter registration may be legally able to tell you how many registered dems and repubs have voted but they can&#039;t give live results of how many obama votes, Mccain votes, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just saw the information on unoffical results being posted from early voting.</p>
<p>All this LEGALLY can tell you is how many people voted at each location in early voting.  We also had the possibility in 2004 to get access to who had voted in 2004 and drop them out of the caling lists.  </p>
<p>states that have party registration with voter registration may be legally able to tell you how many registered dems and repubs have voted but they can&#8217;t give live results of how many obama votes, Mccain votes, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

