Hit the media where it matters. Their jobs.

BO uses the personal touch every chance he gets but not necessarily in person. He has thousands of people in the streets and on message boards attacking everyone who might not be inclined to support their man. People back off. They get tired of being attacked. So if you say something, it is good if it hits people where they live.

I love to use the reality of BO getting federal money for housing in his district, which went to Rezko and a woman who is now on his election team. They did cheap renovations which fell apart in 6 years, refused to answer phones or fix problems, and now most of those people are out of their homes after the roofs caved in, plumbing and electricity failed, and the were frozen out in the Chicago winter. BO gave the people who voted him into office nothing, but his friends made out with a lot of money from those federal grants. In the meantime, Obama redrew his district so that he no longer represented the poor people, but moved his district into the rich people area.

That’s what Socialists and Communists do. Take away from the middle class to help the poor, then keep it for themselves. The poor get a little shot in the arm to keep them on board until their cries can no longer be heard by those who have moved on…as in moveon.org.

I believe there is an accent / on the “E”

There are over 200 sites/groups that call themselves Pumas. Some are in Justsaynodeal and some are not.

Some Pumas have time to do actions from pumapac and some do independent projects (like PumaResponders.com hint hint) and some just believe in their hearts and plan to vote agaisnt Obama.

We are all Pumas.

{{{{{{{ pumas }}}}}}}}

That’s a pretty tenuous connection between violence and some flyer in a newspaper. Why even mention it at all in connection with the McCain campaign?

Our mosques here are pretty well protected, especially during the holy season when there are so many crowds around the mosques. Still there have been some incidents. My friend who live close to her mosque was getting threatening phone calls and contacted authorities–it turned out to be another Moslem from a different country.

We also had incidents in Illinois with synagogues, and unfortunately several people were killed in several towns before the shooter was caught. In this case he had explicit literature that advocated killing certain groups of people.

The killer from the incident at the Knoxville church also had specific literature advocating killing people.
http://camelsnose.wordpress.com/2008/07/30/fatwa-against-liberals/
Glen Greenwald has been documenting it, I link to him in the above piece if anyone wants to look further.

In all of the above situations, the person perpetrating the violence had materials advocating violence. The most recent Ohio incident does not, at least not that I have seen.
It’s the same old campaign trick. Take some idea that’s already somewhere in the public conscientiousness, (like r@cism…), then link it semantically with a political campaign, even if there is no real connection. Who really has time to look up all of this stuff? The public doesn’t fact check and ends up having in their minds that a certain politician was advocating violence against certain groups, when nothing of the sort happened.

The fact is, these incidents against mosques and synagogues have been happening all along. To suddenly claim that they are the result of McCain’s campaign is irresponsible. Show me the proof. There is no proof. Just innuendo. If there was any proof, they would have printed the proof.

It’s just another smear campaign.

overnight funnies posted.

Take it upstairs!